Back to site

©2024. All rights reserved.
Crafted by 4Property.

The Perils of Online Bidding Platforms: A Cautionary Tale

In an era dominated by digital innovation, the real estate market has undergone a significant transformation with the advent of online bidding platforms. While these platforms promise convenience and efficiency, recent stories of dubious practices have raised concerns about their trustworthiness. One such alarming incident was shared with us by a buyer at Karen Mulvaney Property, shedding light on the potential pitfalls of relying solely on these platforms.

The Story

A friend of one of our buyers recently found herself in a precarious situation while bidding on a property through an online platform. Despite lacking mortgage approval or any financial arrangements, she continued to bid unchecked on the agent’s portal. To her surprise, she eventually secured the property, only to realize the gravity of her situation — she couldn’t afford it and was unable to secure financing in time. This incident prompted us to question the integrity of these online bidding platforms.

The Lack of Verification

One glaring issue with online bidding platforms is the lack of stringent verification processes. In traditional property transactions, buyers are required to provide proof of funds or mortgage approval before engaging in serious negotiations. However, the anonymity and ease of online bidding seem to bypass these crucial steps, leading to situations where unqualified buyers secure properties, only to later back out.

The Unseen Competition

One of the most significant drawbacks of online bidding is the lack of transparency regarding who you are bidding against. Unlike traditional auctions where participants are visible, online platforms often leave buyers in the dark about the credibility of their competition. In the aforementioned case, our buyer questioned, “Who are you bidding against? You have no way of knowing if they are as good a buyer as you.” This uncertainty raises concerns about the legitimacy of bids and the potential loss of genuinely interested and capable buyers.

Agent Accountability

The responsibility also falls on real estate agents who choose to utilize these platforms without implementing proper safeguards. In the quest for convenience, some agencies are shifting to an online-only approach, refusing to engage with clients directly and relegating them to automated bidding systems. This detachment from personal interaction raises questions about the commitment of agents to ensuring a fair and secure buying process.

The Karen Mulvaney Property Approach

At Karen Mulvaney Property, we recognize the importance of transparency and accountability in real estate transactions. We refuse to rely solely on online bidding platforms and insist on a more personalized approach. We require proof of funds from buyers, ensuring that all bids are backed by genuine financial capability. Our commitment to integrity and diligence safeguards both buyers and sellers from the risks associated with unverified online transactions.


The recent story shared with us serves as a stark reminder of the potential hazards posed by untrustworthy online bidding platforms. As technology continues to shape the real estate landscape, it is crucial for industry professionals, agents, and buyers to demand accountability and transparency. Without proper safeguards, the convenience offered by online platforms may come at the cost of genuine transactions and the well-being of those involved in the property market. It’s time for a reevaluation of these systems to ensure that the promise of efficiency doesn’t compromise the fundamental principles of trust and reliability in real estate transactions.

Privacy Policy

Pagespeed Optimization by Lighthouse.